4.7 Review

When time is space: Evidence for a mental time line

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 36, Issue 10, Pages 2257-2273

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.08.007

Keywords

Time; Space; Numbers; Cognition; Mental time line; Time representation; ATOM; Mental number line; Numerical cognition; Neglect; Magnitude; Visuospatial attention; SNARC effect

Funding

  1. European Research Council [210922]
  2. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [210922] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Time and space are tightly linked in the physical word. Recently, several lines of evidence have suggested that the mental representation of time might be spatial in nature. For instance, time-space interactions have been described as a strong preference to associate the past with the left space and the future with the right space. Here we review the growing evidence of interactions between time and space processing, systematized according to the type of interaction being investigated. We present the empirical findings supporting the possibility that humans represent the subjective time flow on a spatially oriented mental time line that is accessed through spatial attention mechanisms. The heterogeneous time-space interactions are then compared with the number-space interactions described in the numerical cognition literature. An alternative hypothesis, which maintains a common system for magnitude processing, including time, space, and number, is also discussed. Finally, we extend the discussion to the more general issue of how the representation of these concepts might be grounded into the cortical circuits that support spatial attention and sensorimotor transformations. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available