4.7 Review

Human threat management systems: Self-protection and disease avoidance

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 1042-1051

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.011

Keywords

Self-protection; Disease avoidance; Threat management; Precautionary psychology; Evolutionary psychology; Domain specificity; Fear; Disgust; Prejudice; Stigma; Social cognition; Motivation; Error management

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [MH064734]
  2. National Science Foundation [0642873]
  3. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  5. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [0642873] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Humans likely evolved precautionary systems designed to minimize the threats to reproductive fitness posed by highly interdependent ultrasociality. A review of research on the self-protection and disease avoidance systems reveals that each system is functionally distinct and domain-specific: each is attuned to different cues; engages different emotions, inferences, and behavioral inclinations; and is rooted in somewhat different neurobiological substrates. These systems share important features, however. Each system is functionally coherent, in that perceptual, affective, cognitive, and behavioral processes work in concert to reduce fitness costs of potential threats. Each system is biased in a risk-averse manner, erring toward precautionary responses even when available cues only heuristically imply threat. And each system is functionally flexible, being highly sensitive to specific ecological and dispositional cues that signal greater vulnerability to the relevant threat. These features characterize a general template useful for understanding not only the self-protection and disease avoidance systems, but also a broader set of evolved, domain-specific precautionary systems. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available