4.7 Review

The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages 1562-1592

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.11.007

Keywords

Adaptation; Allostasis; Biological sensitivity to context; Cortisol; Developmental switch point; Evolution; Gender; Life history strategies; Plasticity; Reactivity; Sex differences; Stress

Funding

  1. Regione Piemonte, bando Scienze Umane e Sociali [L.R. n. 4/2006]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [K01 MH077687]
  3. University of Arizona

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the Adaptive Calibration Model (ACM), an evolutionary-developmental theory of individual differences in the functioning of the stress response system. The stress response system has three main biological functions: (1) to coordinate the organism's allostatic response to physical and psychosocial challenges; (2) to encode and filter information about the organism's social and physical environment, mediating the organism's openness to environmental inputs; and (3) to regulate the organism's physiology and behavior in a broad range of fitness-relevant areas including defensive behaviors, competitive risk-taking, learning, attachment, affiliation and reproductive functioning. The information encoded by the system during development feeds back on the long-term calibration of the system itself, resulting in adaptive patterns of responsivity and individual differences in behavior. Drawing on evolutionary life history theory, we build a model of the development of stress responsivity across life stages, describe four prototypical responsivity patterns, and discuss the emergence and meaning of sex differences. The ACM extends the theory of biological sensitivity to context (BSC) and provides an integrative framework for future research in the field. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available