4.5 Review

CORTICAL REORGANIZATION AFTER SPINAL CORD INJURY: ALWAYS FOR GOOD?

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 283, Issue -, Pages 78-94

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.056

Keywords

spinal transection; pain; exercise; brain plasticity; serotonin; brain-derived neurotrophic factor

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (USA) [R01 NS05741]
  2. Shriners Hospital for Children (USA) [89500]
  3. International Foundation for Research in Paraplegia (Switzerland) [P113, P120]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Health and Social Policies [TRA-173]
  5. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (Mineco), Spanish Government (Spain) - FEDER [SAF2012-40109]
  6. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Spain) - FEDER [PI11/02451]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plasticity constitutes the basis of behavioral changes as a result of experience. It refers to neural network shaping and re-shaping at the global level and to synaptic contacts remodeling at the local level, either during learning or memory encoding, or as a result of acute or chronic pathological conditions. 'Plastic' brain reorganization after central nervous system lesions has a pivotal role in the recovery and rehabilitation of sensory and motor dysfunction, but can also be maladaptive''. Moreover, it is clear that brain reorganization is not a static'' phenomenon but rather a very dynamic process. Spinal cord injury immediately initiates a change in brain state and starts cortical reorganization. In the long term, the impact of injury - with or without accompanying therapy - on the brain is a complex balance between supraspinal reorganization and spinal recovery. The degree of cortical reorganization after spinal cord injury is highly variable, and can range from no reorganization (i.e. silencing'') to massive cortical remapping. This variability critically depends on the species, the age of the animal when the injury occurs, the time after the injury has occurred, and the behavioral activity and possible therapy regimes after the injury. We will briefly discuss these dependencies, trying to highlight their translational value. Overall, it is not only necessary to better understand how the brain can reorganize after injury with or without therapy, it is also necessary to clarify when and why brain reorganization can be either good'' or bad'' in terms of its clinical consequences. This information is critical in order to develop and optimize cost-effective therapies to maximize functional recovery while minimizing maladaptive states after spinal cord injury. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Brain compensation. For good? (C) 2014 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available