4.5 Article

REDUCED INFARCT SIZE AND ACCUMULATION OF MICROGLIA IN RATS TREATED WITH WIN 55,212-2 AFTER NEONATAL STROKE

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 207, Issue -, Pages 307-315

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.01.008

Keywords

neonatal stroke; cannabinoids; microglia; neuroinflammation

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [RO1 NS055915, ROI NS44025]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [SAF2009-08145, SAF2008-03122]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Health RENEVAS [RD06/0026/0005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cannabinoids have emerged as brain protective agents under neurodegenerative conditions. Many neuroprotective actions of cannabinoids depend on the activation of specific receptors, cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1R) and type 2 (CB2R). The aim of the present study was to determine whether the CB2R and CB1R agonist WIN 55,212-2 (WIN) protects neonatal brain against focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion and whether anti-inflammatory mechanisms play a role in protection. Seven-day-old rats were subjected to 90min middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), and injured rats were identified by diffusion-weighted MRI during the occlusion. After reperfusion, rats were subcutaneously administered 1 mg/kg of WIN or vehicle twice daily until sacrifice. MCAO led to increased mRNA expression of CB2R (but not CB1R), chemokine receptors (CCR2 and CX3CR1), and cytokines (IL-1 beta and TNF alpha), as well as increased protein expression of chemokines MCP-1 and MIP-1 alpha and microglial activation 24 h after MCAO. WIN administration significantly reduced microglial activation at this point and attenuated infarct volume and microglial accumulation and proliferation in the injured cortex 72 h after MCAO. Cumulatively, our results show that the cannabinoid agonist WIN protects against neonatal focal stroke in part due to inhibitory effects on microglia. (C) 2012 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available