4.5 Article

DENDRITIC MORPHOLOGY CHANGES IN NEURONS FROM THE PREFRONTAL CORTEX, HIPPOCAMPUS AND NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS IN RATS AFTER LESION OF THE THALAMIC RETICULAR NUCLEUS

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 223, Issue -, Pages 429-438

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.07.042

Keywords

thalamic reticular nucleus; dendritic morphology; prefrontal cortex; hippocampus; nucleus accumbens; schizophrenia

Categories

Funding

  1. VIEP-BUAP [FLAG-SAL12-Ind]
  2. CONACYT [129303, 138663]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several studies in rodents have shown that dysfunctions of the thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN) result in deficits of sensory gating and attentional processes, two core features of schizophrenia. TRN receives inputs from the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampal formation, two structures which send excitatory projections to the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) and are interconnected with the basolateral amygdala (BLA). Here we determined whether (and which) changes occurred four weeks after a TRN lesion in the dendritic morphology of pyramidal neurons of layers 3 and 5 of the PFC, neurons of ventral and dorsal hippocampus, BLA, and the medium spiny neurons of the NAcc. Dendritic morphology and characteristics were measured by using Golgi-Cox procedure followed by Sholl analysis. We also evaluated the effects of TRN lesion on exploratory behavior assessed by hole-board test and locomotor activity induced by a novel environment. We found that TRN damage induced a reduction in the exploratory behavior measured by hole-board test with neuronal hypotrophy in PFC (layer 5), CA1 ventral hippocampus and NAcc neurons. Taken together, these data suggest that the behavioral and morphological effects of TRN lesion are, at least partially, mediated by limbic subregions with possible consequences for schizophrenia-related behaviors. (c) 2012 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available