4.5 Article

WALKING PATTERNS IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE WITH AND WITHOUT FREEZING OF GAIT

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages 217-224

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.02.061

Keywords

central pattern generator; freezing of gait; gait disorders; interlimb coordination; Parkinson's disease

Categories

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (NWO) [92.003.490, 016.076.352]
  2. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research [016.116.371]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pathophysiology underlying freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson's disease remains incompletely understood. Patients with FOG (freezers) have a higher temporal variability and asymmetry of strides compared to patients without FOG (non-freezers). We aimed to extend this view, by assessing spatial variability and asymmetry of steps and interlimb coordination between the upper and lower limbs during gait. Twelve freezers, 15 non-freezers, and 15 age-matched controls were instructed to walk overground and on a treadmill. Kinematic data were recorded with a motion analysis system. Both freezers and non-freezers showed an increased spatial variability of leg movements compared to controls. In addition, both patient groups had a deficit in interlimb coordination, not only between ipsilateral arms and legs, but also between diagonally positioned limbs. The only difference between freezers and non-freezers was a decreased step length during treadmill walking. We conclude that parkinsonian gait-regardless of FOG-is irregular, not only in the legs, but also with respect to interlimb coordination between the arms and legs. FOG is reflected by abnormal treadmill walking, presumably because this provides a greater challenge to the defective supraspinal control than overground walking, hampering the ability of freezers to increase their stride length when necessary. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IBRO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available