4.5 Article

PROPRIOCEPTIVE DEFICITS IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE PATIENTS WITH FREEZING OF GAIT

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages 746-752

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.06.071

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; freezing of gait; proprioception; vibration; sensorimotor

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent research has proposed that proprioceptive deficits may exist in Parkinson's disease (PD); however, proprioception has not been studied in those who experience freezing of gait (FOG). Proprioception was investigated through stimulation of proprioceptive receptors via patellar tendon vibration. In a force matching task to either 10% or 30% maximal voluntary contraction, response to vibration with and without vision of a force target was compared between 15 PD with FOG (PD-FOG), 16 PD without FOG (PD non-FOG), and 15 non-PD control participants (Controls). In a 15-s trial, vision of the target was provided for the first 10 s but in the last 5 s, four conditions were possible: (i) vision, no vibration; (ii) vision, vibration; (iii) no vision, no vibration; or (iv) no vision, vibration. The expected healthy response to vibration was an overshoot of the target. Controls and PD non-FOG did not perform significantly different with or without: vibration or vision. PD-FOG performed similarly to Controls and PD non-FOG in the baseline condition (i). Errors by PD-FOG on the other conditions (ii iv) were significantly different from the baseline condition but were not significantly different from each other. The PD-FOG group significantly undershot the target when vibration was added [F((2,36))=4.8376, P<0.02] and when vision was removed [F((2,36))=4.8376, P<0.02]. It is suggested that any deviation from normal sensory availability contributes to severe deficits in PD-FOG. (C) 2011 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available