4.5 Article

REVERSIBLE SUPPRESSION OF FOOD REWARD BEHAVIOR BY CHRONIC MU-OPIOID RECEPTOR ANTAGONISM IN THE NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 170, Issue 2, Pages 580-588

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.07.017

Keywords

reward; ventral striatum; taste reactivity; hedonic value; working for food; obesity

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK071082, DK047348]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Overindulgence in easily available energy-dense palatable foods is thought to be an important factor in the current obesity epidemic but the underlying neural mechanisms are not well understood. Here we demonstrate that mu-opioid receptor signaling in the nucleus accumbens may be important. Protracted suppression of endogenous mu-opioid receptor signaling focused on the nucleus accumbens shell for several days by means of microinjected beta-funaltrexamine (BFNA) diminished both liking of sucrose, as indicated by fewer positive hedonic orofacial responses, and the incentive reinforcement value (wanting) of a food reward, as indicated by lower completion speed and increased time being distracted in the incentive runway. BFNA-treatment also decreased responding to sucrose and corn oil in the brief access lick paradigm, a test measuring a combination of mainly taste-guided liking and low-effort wanting, as well as 4 h intake of sucrose solution. These effects were not due to nonspecific permanent neuronal changes, as they were fully reversible. We conclude that endogenous mu-opioid signaling in the nucleus accumbens is necessary for the full display of palatable food-induced hyperphagia through mechanisms including hedonic, motivational, and reinforcement processes. Development of obesity could be the result of predisposing innate differences in these mechanisms or overstimulation of these mechanisms by external factors. (C) 2010 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available