4.5 Article

ABNORMAL RESPONSE OF MELANIN-CONCENTRATING HORMONE DEFICIENT MICE TO FASTING: HYPERACTIVITY AND RAPID EYE MOVEMENT SLEEP SUPPRESSION

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages 819-829

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.08.048

Keywords

locomotor activity; lateral hypothalamus; NGD-4715; orexin; hypocretin

Categories

Funding

  1. Perot Family Foundation
  2. Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology of Japan Science and Technology Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) is a hypothalamic neuropeptide that has been implicated in energy homeostasis. Pharmacological studies with MCH and its receptor antagonists have suggested additional behavioral roles for the neuropeptide in the control of mood and vigilance states. These suggestions have been supported by a report of modified sleep in the MCH-1 receptor knockout mouse. Here we found that MCH knockout (MCH-/-) mice slept less during both the light and dark phases under baseline conditions. In response to fasting, MCH-/- mice exhibited marked hyperactivity, accelerated weight loss and an exaggerated decrease in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Following a 6-h period of sleep deprivation, however, the sleep rebound in MCH-/- mice was normal. Thus MCH-/- mice adapt poorly to fasting, and their loss of bodyweight under this condition is associated with behavioral hyperactivity and abnormal expression of REM sleep. These results support a role for MCH in vigilance state regulation in response to changes in energy homeostasis and may relate to a recent report of initial clinical trials with a novel MCH-1 receptor antagonist. When combined with caloric restriction, the treatment of healthy, obese subjects with this compound resulted in some subjects experiencing vivid dreams and sleep disturbances. (C) 2008 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available