4.3 Article

Lithium prevents aberrant NMDA-induced F-actin reorganization in neurons

Journal

NEUROREPORT
Volume 25, Issue 17, Pages 1331-1337

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000268

Keywords

actin; bipolar disorder; cellular stress; cytoskeleton; glutamate; lithium; mood stabilizers; neuronal activity; neuroprotection; N-methyl-D-aspartate

Categories

Funding

  1. Novartis AG at The Scripps Research Institute [SFP 1563]
  2. NIH [MH087823]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing evidence suggests that cellular stress may underlie mood disorders such as bipolar disorder and major depression, particularly as lithium and its targets can protect against neuronal cell death. Here we describe N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-induced filamentous actin reorganization (NIFAR) as a useful in-vitro model for studying acute neurocellular stress and investigating the effects of mood stabilizers. Brief incubation of cultured neurons with NMDA (50 mu M, 5 min) induces marked reorganization of F-actin within the somatodendritic domain of a majority of neurons. During NIFAR, F-actin is rapidly depleted from dendritic spines and aberrantly aggregates within the dendrite shaft. The widely used mood stabilizer lithium chloride prevented NIFAR in a time-dependent and dose-dependent manner, consistent with its known efficacy in treating bipolar disorder. Inhibitors of the lithium target glycogen synthase kinase 3 and its upstream activator phosphoinositide-3-kinase also prevented NIFAR. The antidepressant compounds imipramine and fluoxetine also attenuated NIFAR. These findings have potential relevance to neuropsychiatric diseases characterized by excessive glutamate receptor activity and synaptotoxicity. We propose that protection of the dendritic actin cytoskeleton may be a common mechanism shared by various mood stabilizers. (C) 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available