4.3 Article

Cortical thickness of supratemporal plane predicts auditory N1 amplitude

Journal

NEUROREPORT
Volume 23, Issue 17, Pages 1026-1030

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835abc5c

Keywords

auditory cortex; auditory-evoked potential; event-related potential; multimodal imaging; N1; surface-based morphometry

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss National Foundation [320030-120661]
  2. Fonds zur Forderung des akademischen Nachwuchses (FAN) des Zurcher Universitatsvereins (ZUNIV)
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SFB/TR 31]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [320030-120661] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The auditory-evoked potential's N1 component of the scalp electroencephalogram is a well-established measure of electrical brain activity. The N1 reflects basic auditory processing and is modulated by auditory experience, for instance, by musical training. Here, we explore a possible correlation between the auditory N1 amplitude and cortical architecture in the supratemporal plane. We hypothesize that individual differences in N1 amplitude reflect differential acuity, which might also be reflected by differences in auditory cortex anatomy. Auditory potentials evoked by sine wave tones and structural MRI were collected from 27 healthy volunteers. The thickness and surface area of the cortex were calculated using a surface-based morphometry approach. Cortical thickness, rather than surface area, in a cluster on the posterior supratemporal plane, predominantly located on Heschl's sulcus and lateral aspects of Heschl's gyrus, correlated with the N1 amplitude. In particular, lower cortical thickness was associated with larger N1 amplitudes. This is well in agreement with previous functional magnetic resonance studies reporting a thinner cortex to be related to a larger functional response. NeuroReport 23:1026-1030 (C) 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available