4.4 Article

Alteration of brain viscoelasticity after shunt treatment in normal pressure hydrocephalus

Journal

NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages 189-196

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-011-0871-1

Keywords

Normal pressure hydrocephalus; Shunt; Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE); Viscoelasticity; Springpot

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) represents a chronic neurological disorder with increasing incidence. The symptoms of NPH may be relieved by surgically implanting a ventriculoperitoneal shunt to drain excess cerebrospinal fluid. However, the pathogenesis of NPH is not yet fully elucidated, and the clinical response of shunt treatment is hard to predict. According to current theories of NPH, altered mechanical properties of brain tissue seem to play an important role. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a unique method for measuring in vivo brain mechanics. In this study cerebral MRE was applied to test the viscoelastic properties of the brain in 20 patients with primary (N = 14) and secondary (N = 6) NPH prior and after (91 +/- 16 days) shunt placement. Viscoelastic parameters were derived from the complex modulus according to the rheological springpot model. This model provided two independent parameters mu and alpha, related to the inherent rigidity and topology of the mechanical network of brain tissue. The viscoelastic parameters mu and alpha were found to be decreased with -25% and -10%, respectively, compared to age-matched controls (P < 0.001). Interestingly, alpha increased after shunt placement (P < 0.001) to almost normal values whereas mu remained symptomatically low. The results indicate the fundamental role of altered viscoelastic properties of brain tissue during disease progression and tissue repair in NPH. Clinical improvement in NPH is associated with an increasing complexity of the mechanical network whose inherent strength, however, remains degraded.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available