4.4 Article

Absolute choline concentration measured by quantitative proton MR spectroscopy correlates with cell density in meningioma

Journal

NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 61-67

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-008-0461-z

Keywords

Meningioma; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Cell density; Choline

Funding

  1. Japan-China Sasakawa Medical Fellowship (Nippon Foundation, Japan)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was aimed to investigate the relationship between quantitative proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) and pathological changes in meningioma. Twenty-two meningioma cases underwent single voxel 1H-MRS (point-resolved spectroscopy sequence, repetition time/echo time = 2,000 ms/68, 136, 272 ms). Absolute choline (Cho) concentration was calculated using tissue water as the internal reference and corrected according to intra-voxel cystic/necrotic parts. Pathological specimens were stained with MIB-1 antibody to measure cell density and proliferation index. Correlation analysis was performed between absolute Cho concentration and cell density and MIB-1 labeled proliferation index. Average Cho concentration of all meningiomas before correction was 2.95 +/- 0.86 mmol/kg wet weight. It was increased to 3.23 +/- 1.15 mmol/kg wet weight after correction. Average cell density of all meningiomas was 333 +/- 119 cells/HPF, and average proliferation index was 2.93 +/- 5.72%. A linear, positive correlation between cell density and Cho concentration was observed (r = 0.650, P = 0.001). After correction of Cho concentration, the correlation became more significant (r = 0.737, P < 0.001). However, no significant correlation between Cho concentration and proliferation index was found. There seemed to be a positive correlation trend after correction of Cho concentration but did not reach significant level. Absolute Cho concentration, especially Cho concentration corrected according to intra-voxel cystic/necrotic parts, reflects cell density of meningioma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available