4.7 Article

Multilocus Genetic Profile for Dopamine Signaling Predicts Ventral Striatum Reactivity

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 9, Pages 1940-1947

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2011.82

Keywords

genetic profile; dopamine; ventral striatum; reward; fMRI

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [HL040962, MH072837]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research integrating neuroimaging and molecular genetics has yielded important insights into how variability in brain chemistry predicts individual differences in brain function, behavior and related risk for psychopathology. However, existing studies have been limited by their focus on the independent effects of single polymorphisms with modest impact on brain chemistry. Here, we explored the effects of five functional polymorphisms affecting dopamine (DA) signaling on reward-related ventral striatum (VS) reactivity, measured with BOLD fMRI, in a sample of 69 Caucasians. We also compiled individual multilocus genetic profile scores reflecting the additive effects of alleles conferring relatively increased DA signaling across the five polymorphic loci: DAT1 9-repeat, DRD4 7-repeat, DRD2 -141C Del, DRD2 Taq1A C (A2), and COMT (158)Met. These multilocus DA profile scores accounted for 10.9% of the inter-individual variability in reward-related VS reactivity. In contrast, none of the individual polymorphisms accounted for significant variability. Our results show that biologically informed multilocus genetic profiles have unique promise as indices of variability in brain chemistry that may yield advances in mapping individual differences in behaviorally relevant brain function. In turn, such genetic profiles may fuel gene-environment interactions research establishing trajectories of risk for psychopathology. Neuropsychopharmacology (2011) 36, 1940-1947; doi:10.1038/npp.2011.82; published online 18 May 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available