Journal
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 12, Pages 2414-2426Publisher
SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2010.124
Keywords
ADHD; delay discounting; impulsivity; dopamine; DATI; COMT
Categories
Funding
- UK Medical Research Council [G03001896]
- NIH [R01MH62873, R01MH081803]
- Eli Lilly
- Ortho-McNeil
- Shire Development
- Pfizer
- Pfizer, Shire
- National Institutes of Health
- McNeil
- Janssen
- Novartis
- MRC [G0300189] Funding Source: UKRI
- Medical Research Council [G0300189, G9817803B] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Choice impulsivity has been linked to dopamine function and is consistently observed in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as a preference for smaller-immediate over larger-delayed rewards using choice-delay paradigms. More sophisticated delay discounting paradigms have yielded inconsistent results. Context and sample characteristics may have contributed to these variations. In this study we examine the effect of type (real vs hypothetical) and magnitude of reward as well as of variation in dopamine genes on choice impulsivity. We selected 36 male adolescents with ADHD-combined subtype (ADHD-CT) and 32 controls (mean age = 15.42, SD = 2.05) to form four roughly equally sized subgroups on the basis of DAT1(10/6) haplotype dosage (2 copies and <2 copies). Participants, who were also genotyped for the COMTval158met and DRD448bp-VNTR polymorphisms, performed a hypothetical and a real-time discounting task and provided self-ratings of trait impulsivity. The ADHD-CT group discounted rewards more steeply than controls only in the hypothetical task, with delay, but not reward magnitude, influencing choices. They also rated themselves as more impulsive compared with controls. DAT1(10/6) dosage and the COMTVal158Met genotype predicted trait impulsivity and discounting rates in the hypothetical task, but not in the real-time task. Our results directly link variation in genes putatively influencing dopamine signaling in the prefrontal cortex (COMTVal158Met) and the striatum (DAT1(10/6)) with discounting rates in a hypothetical task (but not a real-time task) and self-ratings of trait impulsivity in ADHD-CT and healthy controls. The lack of magnitude effects in the hypothetical task suggests that discounting in this task may be influenced by different processes in ADHD-CT than in healthy controls. Neuropsychopharmacology (2010) 35, 2414-2426; doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.124; published online 25 August 2010
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available