4.7 Article

Altered Negative BOLD Responses in the Default-Mode Network during Emotion Processing in Depressed Subjects

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 932-943

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2008.81

Keywords

default-mode network; negative BOLD responses; major depressive disorder; event-related fMRI; emotional processing

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [DFG, 304/4-1]
  2. Swiss National Research Foundation [3100A0-100830]
  3. Research Foundation at the University of Zurich, Organon, Switzerland
  4. Salus Foundation Sachsen Anhalt/Germany
  5. ETH Zurich (SEP)
  6. Philips Medical Systems
  7. Hartmann-Muller-Foundation
  8. Gebert-Ruf-Foundation
  9. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [BMBF-01GWSO61]
  10. Hope of Depression Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) show predominant negative blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) responses (NBRs) in regions of the default-mode network such as the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and the posterior cingulate cortex. Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) show emotional-cognitive disturbances, which have been associated with alterations within the default-mode network. However, it remains unclear whether these default-mode network alterations are related to abnormalities in NBRs. We therefore investigated neural activity in the default-mode network during different emotional tasks in patients with MDD in an event-related fMRI design. MDD patients showed significantly reduced NBRs in several regions of the default-mode network. Decreased NBRs in MDD patients correlated with depression severity and feelings of hopelessness. In sum, our findings demonstrate that default-mode network NBRs are reduced in MDD and modulate these patients' abnormally negative emotions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available