4.2 Article

Neuromotor Outcomes at School Age After Extremely Low Birth Weight: Early Detection of Subtle Signs

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 66-75

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0020478

Keywords

prematurity; extremely preterm birth; motor overflow movements; cognitive outcome; academic outcome

Funding

  1. Maggie Snyder Foundation
  2. Margaret Snyder

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Motor impairments are prevalent in children born at extremely low birth weight (ELBW; <1,000 g). Rarely studied are subtle motor deficits that indicate dysfunction or delay in neural systems critical for optimal cognitive, academic, and behavioral function. We aimed to examine quantifiable signs of subtle neuromotor dysfunction in an early school-aged ELBW cohort that coincidentally had age-appropriate cognition and design copying. Method: We studied 97 participants born between 1998 and 2001; 74 ELBW (6.7 years +/- 0.75) compared with 23 term-born (6.6 years +/- 0.29). Neuromotor outcomes were assessed using the Physical and Neurological Examination of Subtle Signs-Revised, and measures of dexterity/coordination and visual-motor integration. Results: ELBW participants performed worse than term-born on design-copying and dexterity, were age-appropriate compared to normative data, and had slower timed movements and more subtle overflow movements. Those ELBW born <26 weeks performed most poorly compared with those born 26-34 weeks and term-born. Conclusion: Subtle motor dysfunctions are detectable and quantifiable in ELBW children by school age, even in the presence of average cognition. Early age assessment of incoordination, motor speed, and overflow movements should aid initiation of timely therapies to prepare at-risk ELBW children for subsequent school entry and facilitate design of optimal early treatment strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available