4.5 Article

Direction-selective patterns of activity in human visual cortex suggest common neural substrates for different types of motion

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages 514-521

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.016

Keywords

Second-order motion; Direction selectivity; fMRI; Decoding; Multivoxel pattern analysis

Funding

  1. National Eye Institute [R01 EY014984, R01 EY017082]
  2. American Recover and Reinvestment Act [R01 EY017082-03S1]
  3. [P30 EY008126]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A sense of motion can be elicited by the movement of both luminance- and texture-defined patterns, what is commonly referred to as first- and second-order, respectively. Although there are differences in the perception of these two classes of motion stimuli, including differences in temporal and spatial sensitivity, it is debated whether common or separate direction-selective mechanisms are responsible for processing these two types of motion. Here, we measured direction-selective responses to luminance- and texture-defined motion in the human visual cortex by using functional MRI (fMRI) in conjunction with multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA). We found evidence of direction selectivity for both types of motion in all early visual areas (V1, V2, V3, V3A, V4, and MT+), implying that none of these early visual areas is specialized for processing a specific type of motion. More importantly, linear classifiers trained with cortical activity patterns to one type of motion (e.g., first-order motion) could reliably classify the direction of motion defined by the other type (e.g., second-order motion). Our results suggest that the direction-selective mechanisms that respond to these two types of motion share similar spatial distributions in the early visual cortex, consistent with the possibility that common mechanisms are responsible for processing both types of motion. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available