4.5 Article

It is less than you expected: The feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
Volume 48, Issue 11, Pages 3343-3350

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.023

Keywords

Prediction error; Learning; Outcome; P300

Funding

  1. Ministry of Innovation, Science, Research and Technology of the federal state of Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is involved in performance monitoring and in learning from performance feedback. Recent research suggests that the feedback-related negativity (FRN), an event-related potentials (ERP) component reflecting neural activity in the ACC, codes the size of a negative prediction error when reward probabilities are varied. There is as yet no clear evidence that the FRN is also sensitive to violations of reward magnitude expectations. In the present study. 20 healthy young subjects engaged in a learning task in which a coin had to be found on each trial. The value of the coin (the potential reward magnitude) was varied from trial to trial and amounted to 5 cent, 20 cent or 50 cent. Analysis of ERPs revealed that FRN amplitude differences between reward and non-reward were significantly modulated by (potential) reward magnitude. This effect was driven by the neural response to non-reward: the larger the potential reward, the larger was the FRN amplitude in response to non-reward. In contrast, the P300 was larger for positive outcomes and showed an effect of (potential) reward magnitude independent of valence. Together with evidence from previous studies, these results show that the FRN codes negative prediction errors in the context of varying reward probabilities and magnitudes. The findings are in line with recent results based on functional neuroimaging and lend further support to the idea of a key role of the ACC in the integration of information on different aspects of performance outcomes. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available