4.5 Article

Impaired fixation to eyes following amygdala damage arises from abnormal bottom-up attention

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
Volume 48, Issue 12, Pages 3392-3398

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.025

Keywords

Eye tracking; Gaze contingent; Autism; Bottom up; Intervention; Eye contact

Funding

  1. NIMH
  2. Simons Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SM is a patient with complete bilateral amygdala lesions who fails to fixate the eyes in faces and is consequently impaired in recognizing fear (Adolphs et al 2005) Here we first replicated earlier findings in SM of reduced gaze to the eyes when seen in whole faces Examination of the time course of fixations revealed that SM s reduced eye contact is particular pronounced in the first fixation to the face and less abnormal in subsequent fixations In a second set of experiments we used a gaze-contingent presentation of faces with real time eye tracking wherein only a small region of the face is made visible at the center of gaze In essence viewers explore the face by moving a small searchlight over the face with their gaze Under such viewing conditions SM s fixations to eye region of faces became entirely normalized We suggest that this effect arises from the absence of bottom-up effects due to the facial features allowing gaze location to be driven entirely by top-down control Together with SM s failure to fixate the eyes in whole faces primarily at the very first saccade the findings suggest that the saliency of the eyes normally attract our gaze in an amygdala-dependent manner Impaired eye gaze is also a prominent feature of several psychiatric illnesses in which the amygdala has been hypothesized to be dysfunctional and our findings and experimental manipulation may hold promise for interventions in such populations including autism and fragile X syndrome (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available