4.5 Article

The role of ventral medial prefrontal cortex in social decisions Converging evidence from fMRI and frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
Volume 48, Issue 12, Pages 3505-3512

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.036

Keywords

Ventromedial prefrontal cortex; Social decision making; Frontotemporal dementia

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG17586, AG15116, NS44266, AG32953, NS53488]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) has been implicated in social and affectively influenced decision-making Disease in this region may have clinical consequences for social judgments in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) To test this hypothesis regional cortical activation was monitored with fMRI while healthy adults judged the acceptability of brief social scenarios such as cutting into a movie ticket line or going through a red light at 2 AM The scenarios described (i) a socially neutral condition (II) a variant of each scenario containing a negatively valenced feature and (iii) a variant containing a positively valenced feature Results revealed that healthy adults activated vmPFC during Judgments of negatively valenced scenarios relative to positive scenarios and neutral scenarios In a comparative behavioral study the same social decision-making paradigm was administered to patients with a social disorder due to FTLD Patients differed significantly from healthy controls specifically showing less sensitivity to negatively valenced features Comparative anatomical analysis revealed considerable overlap of vmPFC activation in healthy adults and vmPFC cortical atrophy in FTLD patients These converging results support the role of vmPFC in social decision-making where potentially negative consequences must be considered (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available