4.5 Article

Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Rapid decay of dorsal stream information

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages 1573-1577

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.019

Keywords

Dorsal stream; Memory; Reaching; Obstacle avoidance; Priming

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health to SAJ [1731 NS 047784-01]
  2. National Science Foundation [SBR-94-96290]
  3. National Institute of Mental Health [KO2-MH0097701A1, R15 NS41887-01]
  4. Research and Graduate Studies Office of The College of Liberal Arts, Pennsylvania State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dorsal, action-related, visual stream has been thought to have little or no memory. This hypothesis has seemed credible because functions related to the dorsal stream have been generally unsusceptible to priming from previous experience. Tests of this claim have yielded inconsistent results however. We, argue that these inconsistencies may be due to methodological differences in the time between primes and test stimuli. In this study we sought to clarify the effect of time between primes and test stimuli by having participants complete a visually guided manual obstacle avoidance task with varying times between trials. Consistent with a previous study using this task, we found that hand path curvature depended on the presence or absence of an obstacle in the previous trial. This hand path priming effect decayed quickly as the time between trials increased, and was almost, though not entirely, eliminated when 1000 ms separated successive trials. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that the dorsal stream can be primed but that this priming attenuates rapidly. We suggest that this outcome may indicate that the period over which the dorsal stream retains information may be related to the sequential statistics of action. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available