4.5 Article

Recollection and familiarity in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: A global decline in recognition memory

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
Volume 46, Issue 7, Pages 1965-1978

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.017

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; memory; dual process; process-dissociation procedure; task dissociation

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P50AG005133, K23AG028018] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIA NIH HHS [K23 AG028018-02, P50 AG05133, P50 AG005133, K23 AG028018] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite memory failures being a central feature of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (a-MCI), there is limited research into the nature of the memory impairment associated with this condition. A further understanding could lead to refinement of criteria needed to qualify for this designation and aid in prediction of who will progress to development of clinical Alzheimer's disease. Dual process models posit that recognition memory is supported by the dissociable processes of recollection and familiarity. The present study sought to evaluate recognition memory in a-MCI in the framework of the dual process model. Patients with a-MCI and age- and education-matched controls were tested on three memory paradigms. Two paradigms were modifications of the process-dissociation procedure in which recollection required either memory of word-pair associations (associative) or the font color of words at study (featural). A final paradigm utilized the task-dissociation methodology comparing performance for item and visual spatial source memory. All three tasks revealed that familiarity was impaired to at least the same extent as recollection. As familiarity is thought to be spared in normal aging, its measurement may provide a relatively specific marker for the early pathological changes of Alzheimer's disease. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available