4.5 Article

Mesolimbic interaction of emotional valence and reward improves memory formation

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 1000-1008

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.020

Keywords

emotion; doparnine; midbrain; hippocampus; striatum

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Animal studies suggest that dopaminergic neuromodulation is critical for hippocampal memory formation. Compatible with this notion, recent functional imaging evidence in humans showed that reward modulates the hippocampus-dependent formation of episodic memories through activation of areas belonging to the mesolimbic, dopaminergic system, including the ventral striatum and substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA). However, the amygdala is also closely embedded within this mesolimbic circuitry with reciprocal connections to the SN/VTA, raising the possibility that emotionally valenced stimuli might also interact with hippocampal encoding through dopaminergic neuromodulation. By the same token, emotional processing in the amygdala,might be affected by reward-related processing in the mesolimbic system. In an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study, reward-related activity in the ventral striatum was enhanced by the concurrent presentation of emotionally positive but not emotionally negative stimuli. Emotional processing in the amygdala, on the other hand, was not affected by reward. One day after study, recollection of the positive stimuli was better when they were associated with reward at encoding as compared with unrewarded positive stimuli. The findings are compatible with the notion that the output of the reward system and memory formation in the hippocampus is influenced by positive emotional valence and suggest that the ventral striatum is a key structure for this modulation. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available