4.5 Article

Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks, demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 224-232

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.015

Keywords

activation likelihood estimate; ALE; pre-SMA; response selection

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P41RR015241] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH085328, R01MH078160] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS047781, K02NS044850] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NCRR NIH HHS [P41 RR015241, P41 RR15241] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH078160, R01 MH085328] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS047781, K02 NS44850, K02 NS044850-04, R01 NS047781-03, K02 NS044850] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

FMRI studies of response inhibition consistently reveal frontal lobe activation. Localization within the frontal cortex, however, varies across studies and appears dependent on the nature of the task. Activation likelihood estimate (ALE) meta-analysis is a powerful quantitative method of establishing concurrence of activation across functional neuroimaging studies. For this study, ALE was used to investigate concurrent neural correlates of successfully inhibited No-go stimuli across studies of healthy adults performing a Go/No-go task, a paradigm frequently used to measure response inhibition. Due to the potential overlap of neural circuits for response selection and response inhibition, the analysis included only event-related studies contrasting No-go activation with baseline, which allowed for inclusion of all regions that may be critical to visually guided motor response inhibition, including those involved in response selection. These Go/No-go studies were then divided into two groups: simple Go/No-go tasks in which the No-go stimulus was always the same, and complex Go/No-go tasks, in which the No-go stimulus changed depending on context, requiring frequent updating of stimulus-response associations in working memory. The simple and complex tasks demonstrated distinct patterns of concurrence, with right dorsolateral prefrontal and inferior parietal circuits recruited under conditions of increased working memory demand. Common to both simple and complex Go/No-go tasks was concurrence in the pre-SMA and the left fusiform gyrus. As the pre-SMA has also been shown to be involved in response selection, the results support the notion that the pre-SMA is critical for selection of appropriate behavior, whether selecting to execute an appropriate response or selecting to inhibit an inappropriate response. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available