4.3 Article

Semantic Network Disconnection in Formal Thought Disorder

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOBIOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages 14-23

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000337133

Keywords

Thought disorder; Schizophrenia; Semantic system; Semantic network; Altered connectivity; Independent component analysis; Functional networks; Spatial similarity; Functional connectivity

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [3200B0-100823]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Structural and functional findings in schizophrenic patients with formal thought disorder (FTD) show abnormalities within left-side semantic areas. The present study investigate the network function of the involved brain regions as a function of FTD severity. Methods: We examined a group of 16 schizophrenia patients differing in FTD, but not in overall symptom severity, and 18 matched healthy controls. A passive word reading paradigm was applied during functional MRI (fMRI). A concatenated independent component analysis approach separated the fMRI signal into independent components, and spatial similarity was used to estimate the individual differences in spatial configuration of networks. Results: The semantic network was identified for both groups encompassing structures of the left inferior frontal gyrus, the left angular gyrus and the left middle temporal gyrus. The differences between the semantic networks of patients and controls increased with increasing severity of FTD. This difference was due to a decreasing contribution of the left inferior frontal gyrus (Brodmann area 45 and 47). Conclusion: Severity of FTD was correlated with a disruption of the left semantic network in schizophrenic patients. We suggest that FTD is a consequence of a frontal-parietal/temporal disconnection due to a complex interaction between structural and functional abnormalities within the left semantic network. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available