4.7 Review

Opioids and their receptors: Are we there yet?

Journal

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages 198-203

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.03.039

Keywords

Opioid receptor; Mu receptor; Morphine; Truncated; G-protein coupled receptor; Splice variant; MOR-1

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health [DA02615, DA07242, DA06241]
  2. National Cancer Institute [CA08748]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA008748] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R37DA007242, T32DA007242, R56DA002615, R01DA002615, R01DA007242, R01DA006241] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Opioids have an important place in pharmacology. While their clinical use as analgesics is fundamental in medicine, their use is constrained by their side-effects and abuse potential. Pharmacologists have sought analgesics lacking side-effects and the abuse liability of the current agents. The identification of the opioid receptors in 1973 marked the beginning of our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of these agents. The isolation of the opioid peptides quickly followed, along with the classification of three families of opioid receptors. Clinicians have long been aware of subtle differences among the mu opioids that were not easily reconciled with a single receptor and selective antagonists implied two subdivisions of mu receptors. However, the cloning of the mu opioid receptor MOR-1 has led to the realization of the extensive complexity of the mu opioid receptor gene and its vast array of splice variants. Many of these splice variants are truncated and do not conform to the structure of traditional G-protein coupled receptors. Yet, evidence now shows that they are quite important and may prove valuable targets in the development of potent analgesics lacking the undesirable properties of current opioids. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available