4.7 Review

Looking for the role of cannabinoid receptor heteromers in striatal function

Journal

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 226-234

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.076

Keywords

Local module; Receptor heteromers; Cannabinoid CB1 receptor; Dopamine D-2 receptor; Adenosine A(2A) receptor; mu Opioid receptor; Striatum

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse
  2. National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [ZIADA000493, ZIADA000003] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The introduction of two concepts, local module and receptor heteromer, facilitates the understanding of the role of interactions between different neurotransmitters in the brain. In artificial cell systems, cannabinoid CB, receptors form receptor heteromers with dopamine D-2, adenosine A(2A) and mu opioid receptors. There is indirect but compelling evidence for the existence of the same CB, receptor heteromers in striatal local modules centered in the dendritic spines of striatal GABAergic efferent neurons, particularly at a postsynaptic location. Their analysis provides new clues for the role of endocannabinoids in striatal function, which cannot only be considered as retrograde signals that inhibit neurotransmitter release. Recent studies using a new method to detect heteromerization of more than two proteins, which consists of sequential BRET-FRET (SRET) analysis, has demonstrated that CB1, D-2 and A(2A) receptors can form heterotrimers in transfected cells. It is likely that functional CB1-A(2A)-D-2 receptor heteromers can be found where they are highly co-expressed, in the dendritic spines of GABAergic enkephalinergic neurons. The functional properties of these multiple receptor heteromers and their role in striatal function need to be determined. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available