4.7 Article

Demonstration of functional alpha 4-containing nicotinic receptors in the medial habenula

Journal

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 247-253

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.08.021

Keywords

Addiction; Ion channel; C-fos; Knock-in; mRNA

Funding

  1. PHS [NS31669, DA17173, DA17279]
  2. California Tobacco-Related Disease Research Project
  3. Philip Morris External Research
  4. NARSAD Young Investigator Award
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS031669, R29NS031669] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA017279, R01DA017173] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The medial habenula (MHb) exhibits exceptionally high levels of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), but it remains unclear whether all expressed nAChR subunit mRNAs are translated to form functional receptors. In particular alpha 4 subunits have not been reported to have any functional role, despite strong alpha 4 mRNA expression in the ventrolateral MHb. We studied a strain of knock-in mice expressing fluorescent alpha 4* nAChRs (alpha 4YFP), as well as a knock-in strain expressing hypersensitive alpha 4* nAChRs (alpha 4L9'A). In alpha AYFP mice, there was strong fluorescence in the ventrolateral MHb. In hypersensitive alpha 4YFP mice, injections of a low dose of nicotine (0.1 mg/kg) led to strong c-fos expression in only the ventrolateral region of the MHb, but not in the MHb of wild-type (WT) mice. In MHb slice recordings, ventrolateral neurons from alpha 4L9'A mice, but not from WT mice, responded robustly to nicotine (1 mu M). Neurons in the medial aspect of the MHb had >10-fold smaller responses. Thus alpha 4* nAChRs contribute to the selective activation of a subset of MHb neurons. Subunit composition analysis based on gain-of-function knock-in mice provides a useful experimental paradigm. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available