4.7 Article

Two different molecular mechanisms underlying progesterone neuroprotection against ischemic brain damage

Journal

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages 127-138

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.04.023

Keywords

progesterone (P4); middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO); extracellular receptor kinase (ERK); NMDA receptor (NMDAr); sigma 1(sigma(1)) receptor

Funding

  1. Innovative Research Team in University of China [IRT0631]
  2. JiangSu Province Bureau of Health [H200505]
  3. L. Chen and Scientific Research [13480216]
  4. Scientific Research on Priority Areas [15086270]
  5. Creative Scientific Research [16GS0308]
  6. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  7. Japan Space Forum to M. Sokabe

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herein, we show that a single injection of P4 (4 mg/kg) at 1 h or 48 h, but not 96 h, before middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) produces significant protective effects against the ischemia-induced neuronal death and the deficits in spatial cognition and UP induction. The present study focused on the molecular mechanisms underlying the neuroprotection exerted by P4 administration at I h and 48 h pre-MCAO, termed acute and delayed P4-neuroprotection, respectively. Pharmacology suggested that P4-receptor (P4R) cascading to a Src-ERK1/2 signaling mediated the delayed P4-neuroprotection. To support this, it was observed by anti-phosph-ERK1/2 immunoblots that a single injection of P4 triggered a P4R-mediated persistent increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation and their nuclear translocation for 48 h. In contrast, the acute P4-neuroprotection did not depend on the P4R-mediated Src-ERK1/2 signaling. Instead, the acute P4-administration attenuated the NMDA-induced rise in the intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+](i)) that may be a primary cause for MCAO-induced neuronal injury. This effect seemed to be exerted by an antagonism of sigma(1) receptor since the sigma(1) receptor antagonist NE100 perfectly mimicked the acute P4-neuroprotection and also attenuated the NMDA-induced [Ca2+](i), increase. These findings suggest that the P4 neuroprotection involves two independent processes depending on the timing of P4 administration before MCAO: an acute protection by antagonizing sigma(1) receptor to inhibit NMDAr-Ca2+ influx and a delayed one by an activation of P4R-mediated Src-ERK signaling pathway. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available