4.3 Review

Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part II: Background to a research strategy

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt

Kaelan A. Moat et al.

BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (2014)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research

Story C. Landis et al.

NATURE (2012)

Article Clinical Neurology

The Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR): a national patient-registry

V. K. Noonan et al.

SPINAL CORD (2012)

Editorial Material Clinical Neurology

State of the Science Conference in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 2011: introduction

M. L. Boninger et al.

SPINAL CORD (2012)

Review Health Policy & Services

A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice

Roderik F. Viergever et al.

HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS (2010)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting

Shannon L. Sibbald et al.

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2009)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

How Can We Support the Use of Systematic Reviews in Policymaking?

John N. Lavis

PLOS MEDICINE (2009)

Article Critical Care Medicine

Targeting recovery: Priorities of the spinal cord-injured population

KD Anderson

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA (2004)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Use of research to inform public policymaking

JN Lavis et al.

LANCET (2004)