4.3 Review

Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part II: Background to a research strategy

Journal

SPINAL CORD
Volume 53, Issue 10, Pages 721-728

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sc.2015.86

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Victorian Transport Accident Commission
  2. Australian and New Zealand Spinal Cord Injury Network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study design: Literature review/semi-structured interviews. Objective: To develop a spinal cord injury (SCI) research strategy for Australia and New Zealand. Setting: Australia. Methods: The National Trauma Research Institute Forum approach of structured evidence review and stakeholder consultation was employed. This involved gathering from published literature and stakeholder consultation the information necessary to properly consider the challenge, and synthesising this into a briefing document. Results: A research strategy 'roadmap' was developed to define the major steps and key planning questions to consider; next, evidence from published SCI research strategy initiatives was synthesised with information from four one-on-one semi-structured interviews with key SCI research stakeholders to create a research strategy framework, articulating six key themes and associated activities for consideration. These resources, combined with a review of SCI prioritisation literature, were used to generate a list of draft principles for discussion in a structured stakeholder dialogue meeting. Conclusion: The research strategy roadmap and framework informed discussion at a structured stakeholder dialogue meeting of 23 participants representing key SCI research constituencies, results of which are published in a companion paper. These resources could also be of value in other research strategy or planning exercises.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available