4.8 Article

Distinct Tau Prion Strains Propagate in Cells and Mice and Define Different Tauopathies

Journal

NEURON
Volume 82, Issue 6, Pages 1271-1288

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.047

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Tau Consortium
  2. Muscular Dystrophy Association
  3. American Health Assistance Foundation
  4. Ruth K. Broad Foundation
  5. Harrington Discovery Institute
  6. NIH [1F31NS086251, 1R01NS071835, 1R01NS078398, P01AG019724, P50AG023501]
  7. Hope Center Alafi Neuroimaging Lab
  8. Neuroscience Blueprint Interdisciplinary Center Core award [P30NS057105]
  9. Neurodegenerative Disease Brain Bank at the University of California, San Francisco
  10. Consortium for Frontotemporal Dementia Research
  11. MRC [MR/K022105/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Medical Research Council [MR/K022105/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prion-like propagation of tau aggregation might underlie the stereotyped progression of neurodegenerative tauopathies. True prions stably maintain unique conformations (strains) in vivo that link structure to patterns of pathology. We now find that tau meets this criterion. Stably expressed tau repeat domain indefinitely propagates distinct amyloid conformations in a clonal fashion in culture. Reintroduction of tau from these lines into naive cells reestablishes identical clones. We produced two strains in vitro that induce distinct pathologies in vivo as determined by successive inoculations into three generations of transgenic mice. Immunopurified tau from these mice recreates the original strains in culture. We used the cell system to isolate tau strains from 29 patients with 5 different tauopathies, finding that different diseases are associated with different sets of strains. Tau thus demonstrates essential characteristics of a prion. This might explain the phenotypic diversity of tauopathies and could enable more effective diagnosis and therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available