4.8 Article

Pathfinding of Corticothalamic Axons Relies on a Rendezvous with Thalamic Projections

Journal

NEURON
Volume 77, Issue 3, Pages 472-484

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.031

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [37 MH059962]
  2. NINDS [065048]
  3. Fond National Suisse (FNS) [31003A_122550]
  4. CNRS
  5. Aix-Marseille Universite
  6. Federation pour la Recherche sur le Cerveau
  7. Institut Universitaire de France
  8. INSERM Avenir Program
  9. City of Paris Start-up Program
  10. EURYI program
  11. French Ministry of Research and Fondation ARC pour la recherche sur le cancer
  12. Fondation ARC pour la recherche sur le cancer
  13. EMBO YIP
  14. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_122550] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Major outputs of the neocortex are conveyed by corticothalamic axons (CTAs), which form reciprocal connections with thalamocortical axons, and corticosubcerebral axons (CSAs) headed to more caudal parts of the nervous system. Previous findings establish that transcriptional programs define cortical neuron identity and suggest that CTAs and thalamic axons may guide each other, but the mechanisms governing CTA versus CSA pathfinding remain elusive. Here, we show that thalamocortical axons are required to guide pioneer CTAs away from a default CSA-like trajectory. This process relies on a hold in the progression of cortical axons, or waiting period, during which thalamic projections navigate toward cortical axons. At the molecular level, Sema3E/PlexinD1 signaling in pioneer cortical neurons mediates a waiting signal required to orchestrate the mandatory meeting with reciprocal thalamic axons. Our study reveals that temporal control of axonal progression contributes to spatial pathfinding of cortical projections and opens perspectives on brain wiring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available