4.2 Article

GNE myopathy: A prospective natural history study of disease progression

Journal

NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 380-386

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2014.02.008

Keywords

GNE myopathy; Distal myopathy with rimmed vacuoles (DMRV); Natural history; Respiratory function

Funding

  1. Research on Rare and Intractable Diseases and Labour Sciences Research Grants
  2. Comprehensive Research on Disability Health and Welfare Grants
  3. Health and Labour Science Research Grants
  4. Intramural Research Grants for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders from the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry [23-4/24-6]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25461323] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in the glucosamine (UDP-N-acetyl)-2-epimerase/N-acetylmannosamine kinase gene cause ONE myopathy, a mildly progressive autosomal recessive myopathy. We performed a prospective natural history study in 24 patients with ONE myopathy to select evaluation tools for use in upcoming clinical trials. Patient clinical conditions were evaluated at study entry and one-year follow-up. Of the 24 patients, eight (33.3%) completed a standard 6-min walk test without assistance. No cardiac events were observed Summed manual muscle testing of 17 muscles, grip power, and percent force vital capacity (%FVC) were significantly reduced (p<0.05), and scores for 6-min walk test and gross motor function measure were decreased (p<0.1) after one year. The decrement in %FVC was significant among non-ambulant patients, whereas the decrement in grip power tended to be greater among ambulant patients. The 6-mM walk test, gross motor function measure, manual muscle testing, grip power, and %FVC reflect annual changes and are thus considered good evaluation tools for clinical trials. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available