4.2 Article

Congenital myopathies - Clinical features and frequency of individual subtypes diagnosed over a 5-year period in the United Kingdom

Journal

NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 195-205

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2013.01.004

Keywords

Congenital myopathies; RYR1; Core myopathy; Muscle ultrasound; NEB; MTM1; SEPN1; ACTA1; TPM3

Funding

  1. National Specialist Commissioning Group
  2. Muscular Dystrophy Campaign (MDC)
  3. Great Ormond Street Hospital Children's Charity
  4. Guy's and St. Thomas' Charitable Foundation
  5. MRC [MR/K000608/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/K000608/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The congenital myopathies are a group of inherited neuromuscular disorders mainly defined on the basis of characteristic histopathological features. We analysed 66 patients assessed at a single centre over a 5 year period. Of the 54 patients where muscle biopsy was available, 29 (54%) had a core myopathy (Central Core Disease, Multi-minicore Disease), 9 (17%) had Nemaline Myopathy, 7 (13%) had Myotubular/Centronuclear Myopathy, 2 (4%) had Congenital Fibre Type Disproportion, 6 (11%) had isolated type 1 predominance and 1 (2%) had a mixed Core Rod Myopathy. Of the 44 patients with a genetic diagnosis, RYR1 was mutated in 26 (59%), ACTA1 in 7 (16%), SEPN1 in 7 (16%), MTM1 in 2 (5%), NEB in 1 (2%) and TPM3 in 1 (2%). Clinically, 77% of patients older than 18 months could walk independently. 35% of all patients required ventilatory support and/or enteral feeding. Clinical course was stable or improved in 57/66 (86%) patients, whilst 4 (6%) got worse and 5 (8%) died. These findings indicate that core myopathies are the most common form of congenital myopathies and that more than half can be attributed to RYR1 mutations. The underlying genetic defect remains to be identified in 1/3 of congenital myopathies cases. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available