4.2 Article

Multi-minicore disease and atypical periodic paralysis associated with novel mutations in the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor (RYR1) gene

Journal

NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 166-173

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2009.12.005

Keywords

Multi-minicore disease (MmD); Periodic paralysis; Excitation-contraction coupling (ECC); Skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor (RYR1) gene

Funding

  1. Muscular Dystrophy Association USA
  2. National Institute of Health [AR044657, AR018687]
  3. NSCAG
  4. Guy's and St. Thomas' Charitable Foundation
  5. National Institutes of Health Dental and Craniofacial Training Grant [T32DE07202]
  6. MRC [G0601943] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Medical Research Council [G0601943] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor plays a crucial role in excitation contraction (EC) coupling and is implicated in various congenital myopathies. The periodic paralyses are a heterogeneous, dominantly inherited group of conditions mainly associated with mutations in the SCN4A and the CACNA1S genes. The interaction between RyR1 and DHPR proteins underlies depolarization-induced Ca2+ release during EC coupling in skeletal muscle. We report a 35-year-old woman presenting with signs and symptoms of a congenital myopathy at birth and repeated episodes of generalized, atypical normokalaemic paralysis in her late teens. Genetic studies of this patient revealed three heterozygous RYR1 substitutions (p.Arg2241X, p.Asp708Asn and p.Arg2939Lys) associated with marked reduction of the RyR1 protein and abnormal DHPR distribution. We conclude that RYR1 mutations may give rise to both myopathies and atypical periodic paralysis, and RYR1 mutations may underlie other unresolved cases of periodic paralysis with unusual features. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available