4.3 Article

Using the SAFE Principles When Evaluating Electrical Stimulation Therapies for the Pain of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Journal

NEUROMODULATION
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 299-311

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00373.x

Keywords

Algorithm; continuum of care; failed back surgery syndrome; neuromodulation; pain therapies; SAFE principles; SCS; spinal cord stimulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: In this paper we review the literature on failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) and use principles of Safety, Appropriateness, Fiscal Neutrality, and Effectiveness (SAFE) to determine the appropriate place for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of FBSS. Methods and Results: We analyzed the most recent literature regarding treatments of pain due to FBSS and used the SAFE principles to reprioritize pain treatments, particularly electrical stimulation therapies, for FBSS in a more appropriate, relevant, and up to date continuum of care. Conclusions: Based on this review and analysis of the safety, appropriateness, cost-effectiveness, and efficacy of treatments for the pain of FBSS, relegating SCS to a last resort therapy is no longer justifiable. SCS should be considered before submitting a patient to either long-term systemic opioid therapy or repeat spinal surgery for chronic pain resulting from FBSS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available