4.7 Article

Characterization of the Huntington intermediate CAG repeat expansion phenotype in PHAROS

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 22, Pages 2022-2027

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318294b304

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH/NHGRI/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01HG02449]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: We aimed to describe the clinical phenotype conferred by the intermediate-length huntingtin allele CAG repeat expansion in a population-based study. Methods: The Prospective Huntington At Risk Observational Study (PHAROS) enrolled adults at risk for Huntington disease (HD). They were assessed approximately every 9 months with the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) by investigators unaware of participants' gene status. UHDRS scores were compared according to the Huntingtin gene CAG repeat number: expanded >36, intermediate 27-35, and nonexpanded controls <26. Results: Fifty (5.1%) of the 983 participants had an intermediate allele (IA). They were similar to controls on UHDRS motor, cognitive, and functional measures, but significantly worse behaviorally on apathy and suicidal ideation. On 5 of the 9 other behavioral items and on total behavior, the IA group's scores were worse than those of controls and expanded participants, who themselves scored significantly worse than controls on 6 behavioral measures. Retention rates at 4 years were 48% for the IA group compared to 58% and 60% for the expanded and control groups. Conclusions: In a cohort at risk for HD, the IA was associated with significant behavioral abnormalities but normal motor and cognition. This behavioral phenotype may represent a prodromal stage of HD, with the potential for subsequent clinical manifestations, or be part of a distinct phenotype conferred by pathology independent of the CAG expansion length.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available