4.7 Article

Risk of Parkinson disease after depression A nationwide population-based study

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 81, Issue 17, Pages 1538-1544

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a956ad

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Taipei Veterans General Hospital [V100C-012]
  2. National Science Council (NSC) [NSC 101-2911-I-008-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the risk of Parkinson disease (PD) among patients with depression by using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of a matched cohort of 23,180 participants (4,634 patients with depression and 18,544 control patients) who were selected from the NHIRD. Patients were observed for a maximum of 10 years to determine the rates of new-onset PD, and Cox regression was used to identify the predictors of PD. We also examined the risk of PD after excluding patients who were diagnosed with PD within 2 or 5 years after their depression diagnosis. A logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors associated with PD onset in patients with depression. Results: During the 10-year follow-up period, 66 patients with depression (1.42%) and 97 control patients (0.52%) were diagnosed with PD. After adjusting for age and sex, patients with depression were 3.24 times more likely to develop PD (95% confidence interval 2.36-4.44, p < 0.001) compared with the control patients. After excluding patients who were diagnosed with PD within 2 or 5 years after their depression diagnosis, patients with depression had a higher hazard ratio for developing PD than the control patients. The odds ratios for age (1.09) and difficult-to-treat depression (2.18) showed that each is an independent risk factor for PD in patients with depression. Conclusion: The likelihood of developing PD is greater among patients with depression than patients without depression. Depression may be an independent risk factor for PD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available