4.7 Article

Hepatic mitochondrial dysfunction in manifest and premanifest Huntington disease

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 8, Pages 743-746

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318282514e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Bochum [AZ: F615-2007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: In this cross-sectional study, we investigated whether there is evidence for hepatic mitochondrial dysfunction in manifest and/or premanifest Huntington disease (HD) by using the C-13-methionine breath test. Methods: The C-13-methionine breath test was performed within a group of 21 patients with early manifest HD without medication, 30 premanifest mutation carriers, as well as 36 healthy controls. Premanifest mutation carriers were stratified into the 2 groups preHD-A (further from predicted onset) and preHD-B (nearer) based on a calculation of the probability of estimated disease onset within 5 years. The C-13-methionine breath test was performed after an overnight fasting, breath samples were analyzed by nondispersive isotope-selective infrared spectroscopy, and results expressed as percentage dose recovered after 90 minutes of testing time. Statistical analyses comprised analysis of covariance and post hoc t tests. Results: Patients with manifest HD and mutation carriers from our preHD-B group revealed a lower amount of exhaled (CO2)-C-13 compared with healthy controls (p < 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). In a stepwise linear regression model, breath test results correlate to functional and cognitive scores of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale in manifest and also in premanifest HD. For all mutation carriers together, there was a weak but significant correlation of breath test results to ratio caudate volume/total intracranial volume. Conclusion: This study demonstrates for the first time in vivo a subclinical, hepatic involvement in manifest and premanifest HD. Neurology (R) 2013;80:743-746

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available