4.7 Article

Pain assessment using the NIH Toolbox

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 80, Issue -, Pages S49-S53

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872e80

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Blueprint for Neuroscience Research, NIH [HHS-N-260-2006-0000-7-C]
  2. Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation Boston University
  3. InvivoData
  4. Xenoport
  5. BrightOucome
  6. Veteran's Affairs Research and Development
  7. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDDR)
  8. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
  9. NIH [5RC1NR011804-02, 1U5AR057943-01, U01 DK082342, HHSN265200423601C, HHS-N-260-2006-00007-C, R01HD054569-02NIDRR, 1U01NS056975-01, R01 CA104883, N01-AG-6-0007, HHSN260200600007, 1U01DK082342-01, AG-260-06-01, HD05469]
  10. NIDDR [H133B090024]
  11. AHRQ [1R03HS020700-01]
  12. NorthShore University HealthSystem
  13. Cleveland Clinic Foundation/Teva Neurosciences, Inc.
  14. Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  15. Forest Laboratories, Inc.
  16. Department of Defense (DOD)-United States Army
  17. FWO, Belgium
  18. American Cancer Society (national and Illinois Division)
  19. Australian Research Council [FT0992299]
  20. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [307905]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Pain is an important component of health and function, and chronic pain can be a problem in its own right. The purpose of this report is to review the considerations surrounding pain measurement in the NIH Toolbox, as well as to describe the measurement tools that were adopted for inclusion in the NIH Toolbox assessment battery. Methods: Instruments to measure pain in the NIH Toolbox were selected on the basis of scholarly input from a diverse group of experts, as well as review of existing instruments, which include verbal rating scales, numerical rating scales, and graphical scales. Results: Brief self-report measures of pain intensity and pain interference were selected for inclusion in the core NIH Toolbox for use with adults. A 0 to 10 numerical rating scale was recommended for measuring pain intensity, and a 6-item Patient Reported OutcomeMeasurement Information System (PROMIS) short formformeasuring pain interference. The 8-itemPROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference measure was recommended as a supplementalmeasure. No specific measure was recommended for measuring pain intensity in children. \ Conclusions: Core and supplemental measures were recommended for the NIH Toolbox. Additional measures were reviewed for investigators who seek tools for measuring pain intensity in pediatric samples. Neurology (R) 2013; 80 (Suppl 3):S49-S53

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available