4.7 Article

Olfactory assessment using the NIH Toolbox

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 80, Issue -, Pages S32-S36

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872eb4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Blueprint for Neuroscience Research, National Institutes of Health [HHS-N-260-2006-00007-C]
  2. US Army Research Office [W911NF-11-1-0087]
  3. Department of Defense (ARO)
  4. NIH [R01 DC 03275, P50 DC 006760, RO1 MH 59852, RO1 MH 63381, RO1 AG041795, U54 HD028138, NIH K01 MH090548-01]
  5. Altria Inc.
  6. International Flavors Fragrances
  7. Reckitt Benckiser
  8. Cadbury
  9. SC Johnson Company
  10. Department of Defense [USAMRAA W81XWH-09-1-0467]
  11. Cambridge University Press
  12. Informa
  13. Johns Hopkins University Press
  14. NIA [R01 AG04085-24]
  15. NIDCD [DC02064-14]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The human olfactory system provides us with information about our environment that is critical to our physical and psychological well-being. Individuals can vary widely in their ability to detect, recognize, and identify odors, but still be within the range of normal function. Although several standardized tests of odor identification are available, few specifically address the issues in testing very young children, most of whom are likely to be unfamiliar with many of the odor stimuli used in adult tests and have limited ability to read and identify labels to select among choices. Based on the format of the San Diego Odor Identification Test and the delivery system of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, we developed 2 versions of an odor identification test using standardized odor stimuli in a scratch-and-sniff format in which participants match 5 (children) or 9 (adults) odors to pictures representing the odor source. Results from normative testing and validation showed that for most participants, the test could be completed in 5 minutes or less and that the poorer performance among the youngest children and the elderly was consistent with data from tests with larger numbers of items. Expanding on the pediatric version of the test with adult-specific and public health-relevant odors increased the ecological validity of the test and facilitated comparisons of intraindividual performance across developmental stages. Neurology (R) 2013; 80 (Suppl 3):S32-S36

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available