4.7 Article

Evidence-based guideline update: Pharmacologic treatment for episodic migraine prevention in adults Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Headache Society

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 17, Pages 1337-1345

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182535d20

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. American Academy of Neurology
  2. American Headache Society
  3. AGA
  4. Allergan
  5. Boston Scientific
  6. Capnia
  7. Coherex
  8. Endo Pharmaceuticals
  9. GlaxoSmithKline
  10. Lilly
  11. MAP
  12. Medtronic
  13. Merck
  14. NINDS
  15. NuPathe
  16. St. Jude Medical
  17. Valeant Pharmaceuticals
  18. Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  19. Wolff's Headache
  20. Advanced Neurostimulation Systems
  21. St Jude Medical, Inc.
  22. NINDS/NIH
  23. Mayo Clinic
  24. Forest Laboratories
  25. Eli Lilly
  26. Neurogesx
  27. Pfizer
  28. NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To provide updated evidence-based recommendations for the preventive treatment of migraine headache. The clinical question addressed was: What pharmacologic therapies are proven effective for migraine prevention? Methods: The authors analyzed published studies from June 1999 to May 2009 using a structured review process to classify the evidence relative to the efficacy of various medications available in the United States for migraine prevention. Results and Recommendations: The author panel reviewed 284 abstracts, which ultimately yielded 29 Class I or Class II articles that are reviewed herein. Divalproex sodium, sodium valproate, topiramate, metoprolol, propranolol, and timolol are effective for migraine prevention and should be offered to patients with migraine to reduce migraine attack frequency and severity (Level A). Frovatriptan is effective for prevention of menstrual migraine (Level A). Lamotrigine is ineffective for migraine prevention (Level A). Neurology (R) 2012; 78: 1337-1345

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available