4.7 Article

Chitinase enzyme activity in CSF is a powerful biomarker of Alzheimer disease

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 8, Pages 569-577

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318247caa1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [KFO 142: RU745-13]
  2. European Union (Geninca, Telomarker)
  3. Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Heidelberg (WIN-Kolleg)
  4. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)
  5. European Commission (NaDiNe)
  6. Bayer Schering Pharma
  7. Biogen Idec
  8. Genzyme Corp.-Virotec
  9. Merck Serono
  10. Novartis
  11. Roche
  12. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  13. Gemeinnutzige Hertie-Stiftung
  14. GBS-Polyradiculitis-Stiftung
  15. University of Ulm
  16. Landesstiftung BW
  17. Alzheimer Forschung Initiative
  18. Biomedical Research Centre (UK)
  19. Alzheimer Research UK
  20. Dunhill Medical Trust
  21. Society for Support of Research in Experimental Neurology, Vienna, Austria
  22. German Science Foundation (DFG)
  23. German federal ministry of education and research (BMBF)
  24. sanofi-aventis
  25. Pfizer Inc
  26. Eisai Inc.
  27. Nutricia GmbH
  28. Heel GmbH
  29. Heidelberg Academy of Science and the Humanities
  30. Medical Research Council [G0502157, G0400074, G0700718B, G1100540, G0900652] Funding Source: researchfish
  31. MRC [G1100540, G0400074, G0502157, G0900652] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: DNA damage accumulation in brain is associated with the development of Alzheimer disease (AD), but newly identified protein markers of DNA damage have not been evaluated in the diagnosis of AD and other forms of dementia. Methods: Here, we analyzed the level of novel biomarkers of DNA damage and telomere dysfunction (chitinase activity, N-acetyl-glucosaminidase activity, stathmin, and EF-1 alpha) in CSF of 94 patients with AD, 41 patients with non-AD dementia, and 40 control patients without dementia. Results: Enzymatic activity of chitinase (chitotriosidase activity) and stathmin protein level were significantly increased in CSF of patients with AD and non-AD dementia compared with that of no dementia control patients. As a single marker, chitinase activity was most powerful for distinguishing patients with AD from no dementia patients with an accuracy of 85.8% using a single threshold. Discrimination was even superior to clinically standard CSF markers that showed an accuracy of 78.4% (beta-amyloid) and 77.6% (tau). Combined analysis of chitinase with other markers increased the accuracy to a maximum of 91%. The biomarkers of DNA damage were also increased in CSF of patients with non-AD dementia compared with no dementia patients, and the new biomarkers improved the diagnosis of non-AD dementia as well as the discrimination of AD from non-AD dementia. Conclusions: Taken together, the findings in this study provide experimental evidence that DNA damage markers are significantly increased in AD and non-AD dementia. The biomarkers identified outperformed the standard CSF markers for diagnosing AD and non-AD dementia in the cohort investigated. Neurology (R) 2012;78:569-577

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available