4.7 Article

Plasma multianalyte profiling in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 79, Issue 9, Pages 897-905

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318266fa70

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [AG10124, AG17585, P50 AG05681, P01 AG03991, P01 AG026276, P30 NS057105, P30 AG010129, K01 AG030514, NIA P01 AG 09215-20, NIA P30 AG 10124-18, NIA PO1 AG 17586-10, NIA 1PO1 AG-19724-07, NIA 1 U01 AG 024904-05, NINDS P50 NS053488-02, NIA UO1 AG029213-01]
  2. Penn-Pfizer Research Alliance at Penn
  3. Pfizer
  4. Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Research Initiative at Washington University
  5. Viretta Brady Discovery Fund
  6. Emory University Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases at Emory University
  7. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health) [U01 AG024904]
  8. National Institute on Aging
  9. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  10. Abbott
  11. AstraZeneca AB
  12. Bayer Schering Pharma AG
  13. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  14. Eisai Global Clinical Development
  15. Elan Corporation
  16. Genentech
  17. GE Healthcare
  18. GlaxoSmithKline
  19. Innogenetics
  20. JohnsonJohnson
  21. Eli Lilly and Co.
  22. Medpace, Inc.
  23. Merck and Co., Inc.
  24. Novartis AG
  25. Pfizer Inc
  26. F. Hoffman-La Roche
  27. Schering-Plough
  28. Synarc, Inc.
  29. Alzheimer's Association
  30. Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
  31. US Food and Drug Administration
  32. Dana Foundation
  33. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), NIH [UL1 RR024992]
  34. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
  35. AstraZeneca
  36. Pfizer Inc.
  37. Eli Lilly and Company
  38. Forest Laboratories, Inc.
  39. NIH
  40. Cure Alzheimer's Fund
  41. Fidelity Foundation
  42. Morris K. Udall Parkinson's Disease Research Center of Excellence from NINDS [NS-053488]
  43. health research grant by Department of Health of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania from the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement [SAP4100027296, 2001-77]
  44. Teva Neuroscience
  45. Supernus Pharmaceuticals
  46. Merck Serono
  47. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd.
  48. NIH NIA [NINDS P50 NS053488-02, NIA UO1 AG029213-01, PO1 AG 17586-10, PO1 AG-032953]
  49. Marian S. Ware Alzheimer Program
  50. Wyeth
  51. Novartis
  52. Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
  53. NIA [P30AG036468]
  54. [RC2NS069368]
  55. [RC1AG035427]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: While plasma biomarkers have been proposed to aid in the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD), few biomarkers have been validated in independent patient cohorts. Here we aim to determine plasma biomarkers associated with AD in 2 independent cohorts and validate the findings in the multicenter Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Methods: Using a targeted proteomic approach, we measured levels of 190 plasma proteins and peptides in 600 participants from 2 independent centers (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Washington University, St. Louis, MO), and identified 17 analytes associated with the diagnosis of very mild dementia/mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD. Four analytes (apoE, B-type natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, pancreatic polypeptide) were also found to be altered in clinical MCI/AD in the ADNI cohort (n = 566). Regression analysis showed CSF A beta 42 levels and t-tau/A beta 42 ratios to correlate with the number of APOE4 alleles and plasma levels of B-type natriuretic peptide and pancreatic polypeptide. Conclusion: Four plasma analytes were consistently associated with the diagnosis of very mild dementia/MCI/AD in 3 independent clinical cohorts. These plasma biomarkers may predict underlying AD through their association with CSF AD biomarkers, and the association between plasma and CSF amyloid biomarkers needs to be confirmed in a prospective study. Neurology (R) 2012;79:897-905

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available