4.7 Review

Parkinson disease and driving An evidence-based review

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 79, Issue 20, Pages 2067-2074

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182749e95

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Parkinson's Foundation [NPF 00085107]
  2. Rehabilitation Research and Development Branch, Department of Veterans Affairs [1 I01 RX000170, B6918]
  3. NIH [R01 NS044930]
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Rehabilitation Research and Development [1-B6261R, 2-I01 RX000 170-01]
  5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke from NIH [R01 NS044930]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growing literature on driving in Parkinson disease (PD) has shown that driving is impaired in PD compared to healthy comparison drivers. PD is a complex neurodegenerative disorder leading to motor, cognitive, and visual impairments, all of which can affect fitness to drive. In this review, we examined studies of driving performance (on-road tests and simulators) in PD for outcome measures and their predictors. We searched through various databases and found 25 (of 99) primary studies, all published in English. Using the American Academy of Neurology criteria, a study class of evidence was assigned (I-IV, I indicating the highest level of evidence) and recommendations were made (Level A: predictive or not; B: probably predictive or not; C: possibly predictive or not; U: no recommendations). From available Class II and III studies, we identified various cognitive, visual, and motor measures that met different levels of evidence (usually Level B or C) with respect to predicting on-road and simulated driving performance. Class I studies reporting Level A recommendations for definitive predictors of driving performance in drivers with PD are needed by policy makers and clinicians to develop evidence-based guidelines. Neurology (R) 2012; 79: 2067-2074

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available