4.7 Article

Tafamidis for transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy A randomized, controlled trial

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 79, Issue 8, Pages 785-792

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182661eb1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FoldRx
  2. NIH [DK 46335]
  3. FDA Orphan Drug grant [FD-R-00(03414-01)]
  4. FoldRx Pharmaceuticals
  5. Pfizer Inc
  6. Portuguese government foundation
  7. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [SFRH/BD/66216/2009]
  8. Bayer-Schering Pharma AG
  9. Biogen Idec Inc.
  10. Merck Serono S.A.
  11. National Institutes of Health
  12. Bayer Schering Pharma
  13. Biogen
  14. CSL Behring
  15. Serono
  16. Teva
  17. Astellas
  18. Novartis
  19. Roche
  20. Wyeth (Pfizer)
  21. FoldRx Pharmaceuticals/Pfizer Inc.
  22. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/66216/2009] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 18 months of tafamidis treatment in patients with early-stage V30M transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy (TTR-FAP). Methods: In this randomized, double-blind trial, patients received tafamidis 20 mg QD or placebo. Coprimary endpoints were the Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limbs (NIS-LL) responder analysis (<2-point worsening) and treatment-group difference in the mean change from baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy total score (TQOL) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (n = 125). These endpoints were also evaluated in the efficacy-evaluable (EE; n = 87) population. Secondary endpoints, including changes in neurologic function, nutritional status, and TTR stabilization, were analyzed in the ITT population. Results: There was a higher-than-anticipated liver transplantation dropout rate. No differences were observed between the tafamidis and placebo groups for the coprimary endpoints, NIS-LL responder analysis (45.3% vs 29.5% responders; p = 0.068) and change in TQOL (2.0 vs 7.2; p = 0.116) in the ITT population. In the EE population, significantly more tafamidis patients than placebo patients were NIS-LL responders (60.0% vs 38.1%; p = 0.041), and tafamidis patients had better-preserved TQOL (0.1 vs 8.9; p = 0.045). Significant differences in most secondary endpoints favored tafamidis. TTR was stabilized in 98% of tafamidis and 0% of placebo patients (p < 0.0001). Adverse events were similar between groups. Conclusions: Although the coprimary endpoints were not met in the ITT population, tafamidis was associated with no trend toward more NIS-LL responders and a significant reduction in worsening of most neurologic variables, supporting the hypothesis that preventing TTR dissociation can delay peripheral neurologic impairment. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that 20 mg tafamidis QD was associated with no difference in clinical progression in patients with TTR-FAP, as measured by the NIS-LL and the Norfolk QOL-DN score. Secondary outcomes demonstrated a significant delay in peripheral neurologic impairment with tafamidis, which was well tolerated over 18 months. Neurology (R) 2012;79:785-792

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available