4.7 Article

Age-related changes in the default mode network are more advanced in Alzheimer disease

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 16, Pages 1524-1531

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318233b33d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01-AG11378, P50-AG16574, U01-AG06786]
  2. Mayo Foundation, USA
  3. Opus building [NIH C06-RR018898]
  4. Robert H. Smith Family Foundation
  5. NIH/NIA-University of Pittsburgh Alzheimer Disease Research Center
  6. Elan/Janssen AI
  7. Baxter International Inc.
  8. Forest Laboratories, Inc.
  9. Cephalon, Inc.
  10. Allon Therapeutics, Inc.
  11. NIH/NIA
  12. Alzheimer's Association
  13. Mangurian Foundation
  14. Pfizer Inc
  15. Mayo Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate age-related default mode network (DMN) connectivity in a large cognitively normal elderly cohort and in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) compared with age-, gender-, and education-matched controls. Methods: We analyzed task-free-fMRI data with both independent component analysis and seed-based analysis to identify anterior and posterior DMNs. We investigated age-related changes in connectivity in a sample of 341 cognitively normal subjects. We then compared 28 patients with AD with 56 cognitively normal noncarriers of the APOE epsilon 4 allele matched for age, education, and gender. Results: The anterior DMN shows age-associated increases and decreases in fontal lobe connectivity, whereas the posterior DMN shows mainly age-associated declines in connectivity throughout. Relative to matched cognitively normal controls, subjects with AD display an accelerated pattern of the age-associated changes described above, except that the declines in frontal lobe connectivity did not reach statistical significance. These changes survive atrophy correction and are correlated with cognitive performance. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the DMN abnormalities observed in patients with AD represent an accelerated aging pattern of connectivity compared with matched controls. Neurology (R) 2011;77:1524-1531

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available